Contact · editorial correspondence
Contact Legit CJC-1295
For corrections, source suggestions, and editorial questions about how the CJC-1295 literature is summarized here.
Editorial correspondence
Legit CJC-1295 is an editorial research digest about CJC-1295, not a clinic or a vendor. We welcome correspondence about the content: corrections to a citation, a study we should add, or a question about how a finding is characterized. If a quantitative claim on the site looks wrong, point us to the source and we will check it against the published record.
We cannot answer requests for medical advice, dosing, or treatment, and we cannot help with purchasing, sourcing, or supplier questions. CJC-1295 is not approved for human use, and this site does not sell, distribute, or recommend where to obtain it. Those messages will not receive a substantive reply, because answering them is outside what this project is.
What to expect
This is a small editorial project. Use the form to send an editorial message; replies are not guaranteed and are not a consultation of any kind. Nothing sent or received through this page constitutes medical, legal, or professional advice.
The most useful messages are specific: a reference, a page, and what you think is inaccurate. If a half-life figure, a dose, or a regulatory statement on the site does not match the source you are reading, name the source. That is the kind of correspondence that keeps a digest honest, and it is the kind we read most carefully.
On accuracy and corrections
Because the CJC-1295 literature is small and frequently misquoted, accuracy is the point of this project. If a study has been superseded, if a citation has rotted, or if a claim has drifted from what its source actually measured, we want to know. Corrections are logged against the reference they concern.
We do not accept content submissions, guest posts, or promotional material, and we do not exchange links. The site is a reading of the published record, and its only obligation is to that record. Editorial correspondence is the one channel that matters here, and a precise note about a specific source is always worth sending.